Paul Roark wrote: >> <big snip> >> >> I think I'm going to start using EAM for display prints only (where image >> permanence is primary) and Museo for the old photo reproductions (where long >> term dark storage is the issue). >> > Harvey Ferdschneider wrote: >Shouldn't the Museo cover both issues? Not for me. The Museo doesn't print well in the 3000 -- blotchy. I have no idea why it looks worse in that printer than the 1160. Anyway, I prefer the EAM smooth surface. Also, the Museo black is only about 97% of EAM's. Finally, in my fade tests, while the Museo was in the ballpark at the 50% spot, the 90% patch faded more than twice as much as that of the EAM 90% patch. Paul
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 19th Century Varnished Prints and Other Observations
2001-11-17 by Paul Roark