I just wanted to thank Roy Harrington once again publicly for all he had done for this global digital monochrome community. He deservs the engineer of the decade award for QTR, and the way he had made it available to us so unselfishly. I thought is was cool with straight quad inksets but with Ultrachrome, I'm amazed. I set up my new 9600 yesterday and today I did 15 variations of monochrome toning of one portrait image on H. Photo Rag. These curves are so easy to use and this interface so amazingly clear and user friendly I don't know what to say. It took me six months to TRY to do with the Lyson Small Gamut tonable quad inkset what I did in one hour with UltraChrome and QTR. And the Lyson tonable system never was satisfactory in regard to metamerism or color purity. Everyone of these variations I did this first day with QTR are worthy of putting in a gallery. None of them are THE one, they all have their own qualities and none by the way have any noticeable metamerism and with my drum scan I have very nice blacks and subtle high values. And I've just started. So far if I have a favourites from one days work the hue curve selections that I like ( today) are - W 50%/ C 50% for a warm neutral, CS 70% / C 30% for cool neutral, and W/W 100% for a carbon sepia hue. But there plenty of other combinations that I like as well, such as the 100% CSel curves he already worked out. I know this took a lot of work from this team and I just feel so much hope with my vocation when I see someone doing things right that can make me think more creatively without having to fight the technology. Does anyone have any personal choices for curve percentages/ paper combinations with QTR and Ultrachrome? I'm curious what others are doing with this set up. Finally, how much of this ink is coming out of the color channels? This I am not clear about. I mean there is no metamerism and I find it hard to belive that I'm getting this subtle of tonal rendition out of just 2 black channels? Thanks again, John
Message
QTR and 9600 match made in heaven - Roy, thank you sir!
2005-02-11 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.