Thanks Paul. Guess I'll stick with the old PrintShield. Carl On Feb 15, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Paul Roark wrote: > > Carl, > >> ... announcing that PremierArt is >> releasing a new water based coating at PMA, "EcoPrintShield": > >> All current users of PrintShield, Premier has made a new aquios based >> protective spray. They are currently testing the product, but expect >> great results for the archival qualities! This product will be >> available soon, and it will be introduced at PMA. Look for the Premier >> Art booth if you are attending. > > I have some beta Eco Print Shield. It seems better than any other > water-borne coating I've used. For example, there is at least one > Wilhelm > test that has used a version of it with success. However, I've never > been > able to get smooth coats on larger prints with these water-borne > coatings. > Until someone finds an easy way to get a smooth application, I'm going > to > stick to the aerosol, solvent-based Print Shield. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > _________________________________ > > > > > On Feb 15, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Paul Roark wrote: > >> >> Arthur, >> >>> At 11:15 PM 2/14/2005, Paul Roark wrote: >> >>>>> UV rays, >>> >>>> Many can do this. >>>> I suspect this is what allows the PremierArt coatings to >>>> extend the display lives of UltraChrome prints. >>> >>>>> and also varnishes the paper >>>>> to the extent that it evenly covers bronzing? >>> >>>> I use the PremierArt Print Shield for this. >> >>> Would you also use Print Shield on black and white prints >>> made with UT-FS inks? >> >> Yes. I have the UT-FSN+ inkset in my 7500 and routinely spray the >> Epson >> Premium Semimatte prints. I use 4 light coats, sprayed using >> different >> sweeps (horizontal, vertical, & 2 diagonals) to get a very even >> coating. >> >> As Lou noted, it changes the appearance slightly. I find it a >> significant >> overall improvement -- no bronzing and better dmax being the most >> important >> visual changes. The changes are not enough that I make a separate >> curve for >> coated as opposed to uncoated prints. (With water-based coatings I >> found I >> did need separate curves. The water-borne coating just are not worth >> all >> the trouble, in my view.) >> >> Paul >> www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Coatings for Matte Prints
2005-02-15 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.