Hi Daniel, Thank you for the answer. Yesterday a made a scan of the two printed 21-step-wide test pattern. Then I scanned it and made an excel table with the average values of each step. Printing a line graph together with an ideal linear one I verified that while the UT7/Roark/Epson curve is quite perfectly linear, my QTR ones have a different slope. I'll follow your suggestion and linearize the QTR curve using my flatbed scanner as a desitometer, hoping it has a linear output curve :o) Ciao Marco --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Staver <daniel@p...> wrote: > Hi Marco, > > I'm the one who created those curves. Others have also reported back to > me that they seem too dark in the shadows, but here 95% on the stepwedge > is actually a bit lighter than the same stepwedge printed with Paul's > curves. > > I don't have an explanation for this except that one of my inks may be > configured incorrectly or that my printer is behaving differently than > others. > > Fortunately, with todays release of QTR with profiling you can now tweak > your own curves. You can even linearize using your own scanner if you > don't own a densitometer. See my separate post on this. > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no > > >
Message
Re: MIS UT7 - Epson 2100 - Epson Driver vs QTR
2005-02-16 by Marco Ristuccia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.