--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Walt Farrell <wftemp1@h...> wrote: > Johnny Eades wrote: > > You DO CONVERT the target to Gray Matte before printing. That > > is what you normally do to print QTR, right? Don't feel it's > > a dumb question, often I read something and try to understand > > it several times and often try several different things before > > I really see what the process is. As Thomas Edison said after > > 25000 tries on the electric light bulb, "Now I know 25000 ways > > NOT to make an electric light bulb." > > > > This has me somewhat confused. > > I do NOT convert the target to Gray Matte before printing with > QTR (on the PC). > > Is this a Mac vs PC workflow difference? (Ferdinand, to whom you > responded, is a PC user.) > > Thanks, > Walt I thought I undertood this, but maybe I don't. Yes, I'm a PC user. On a Mac, presumably you'd be printing a grayscale image which is originally in the lab-gray space, using "print with preview" in PSCS, and converting to gray-matte as part of the printing process. You can print direct to QTR, and do the profile conversion on the fly. On a PC, you have to convert the grayscale image in the gray-lab space to gray-matte yourself, and first save to file before giving it to QTR. I can't see a huge amount of difference in the Mac vs PC workflow, but perhaps I've missed something. Is it something to do with the differences between gray-lab and gray-matte? On a PC you'd be making adjustments to the output levels on the gray-matte file. On a Mac, you'd be doing it on the image in the gray-lab space, and doing the profile conversion on the fly when printing? I found that if I don't convert the target chart to gray-matte, then my Epson 2100 (UC, EEM) can print distinguishable blacks virtually down to zero. If I do convert the test chart to gray-matte, then it's black from about level 5 down. This probably isn't a huge difference for most images. Even so, perhaps someone can explain *WHY* we need to convert the chart to gray-matte. F_P
Message
[Digital BW] Re: QTR: Great Tool ... no casts, But
2005-02-16 by ferdinand_paris
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.