Hi Richard, --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "richard_h95050" <richardh@j...> wrote: > > However, now that Roy (and Steve) have released QTR with profiling > capabilities, has anyone done a similar comparison betweeen IJC/OPM > and QTR after doing a profiling/linearization for their own system? I haven't done a thorough comparison of the two systems but sofar it appears they both produce very excellent results. There is though one issue related to dmax with IJC/OPM which Joe Berndt is working on. He's working on some special algorithm to boost the dmax of the old 1160 printer. I'll let Joe make the announcement when he's ready. Both software are very easy to use. You got a slick UI with IJC/OPM but with QTR you don't even have to mess with the creation of an initial ink curve, just print, measure, and fill in a couple of values in the UI and you got curves, and of course both systems have linearization steps. Stephen Billard's QTRGui is making QTR very user friendly like IJC/OPM. There are though two improvements I'd like to have in both systems: 1. In QTR: something like "print target for linearization". I made the mistake of printing a target for linearization with linearization info already included and got terrible results until I got it figured out. 2. In both: a custom brightness curve. IJC/OPM has an Aim Curve but I'd like to have the ability to add more control points. Overall I'm very impressed with both systems as they both produce excellent profiles. --nick
Message
Re: IJC/OPM vx. QTR (was IJC/OPM vx. IP)
2005-02-17 by Nick H. Nugent
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.