> From: Steve Kale [mailto:stevekale@...] > > Wow sounds like a lot of work. I started playing with channel mixer as a > result of some desaturated colour work - take a colour image and > work it up > to satisfaction, then apply a channel mixer layer with dramatic > mix (eg Red > 200%, Green -50%, Blue -50%) and then set the opacity of this layer at > around 65% for a colour/B&W hybrid. I am still not conceptually getting > what is happening when, with monochrome checked, a channel is set > to greater > than 100% or at a negative value.....but I like the results. If a channel's gain is set to greater than 100%, it boosts the contrast of that channel. This is sometimes useful, especially if combined with a negative value in another channel, but can lead to blown highlights in areas that are predominately that color. If a gain is set to a negative value by itself (along with a postive constant), that would invert the image. However, negative values are primarily useful, as you found out with your sky experiments, for darkening a part of the picture that's a different color from the rest, as opposed to creating a negative effect. You can do a lot of bogus thins with the Channel Mixer, and it's certainly not the be-all end-all of B&W conversions, but people use it because often it provides an easy way to do some fairly obvious things. Indeed, if I just want to use a single channel as-is, and discard the other two, I prefer the channel mixer over Split Channels because the latter clobbers the file name and discards the EXIF info. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Understanding channel mixer
2005-02-17 by Paul D. DeRocco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.