Oh, he was talking about gloss differential ( surface sheen differences between areas of the print) and possibly bronzing ( of shadows ). Neither of these are metamerism, which is what I was asking about. All pigments have the above two characterists t some degree on glossy media in my experience, even the hybred dye-pigment inkset of the 1280 type printers. I have never minded it on Premium Luster, even with my Epson CF inkset when sprayed. And you guys are right, they need to be sprayed to reduce these relief effects, but that will have no effect on total print color. Anyway I'll check it out next week and see what I can come up with. It would be nice to be able to make monochrome semi-glossy prints that are neutral in color. I wish that new Lyson gloss paper that looks so much like gelatin silve paper would work with pigments. According to Lyson it doesn't. But, whatever. John My limited experience when printing with Photo Black and Epson Pr. Luster using only the two blacks(QTR-warm) was heavy metamerism of the light black such that when viewed at an angle, the mid-tones looked etched. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Staver <daniel@p...> wrote: > > I often read people calling both issues bronzing. Bronzing is seeing > > the darker inks turn bronze in color when viewed at different angles. > > The other is almost like a knock out of the print areas where there > > is total white (paper)... Or lighter values causing a different look > > to the printed areas. > > I'd usually describe both as bronzing. But perhaps this is where we > would use the term 'gloss differential'? > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Is QTR truly neutral?
2005-02-20 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.