Terry, Just to clarify...are you saying that you have used the MIS VM inks with the 2000P? If so, how did you do it and with which curves? Helene > When you consider the 2000P has 7 picoliter heads and the 1280 has 4, > it is amazing just how smooth the 2000P is in comparing prints. Yes > you can look at them under a loupe and the 1280 will look better > (esp. at 2880), but at a standard viewing distance the 2000P looks > more like a "traditional" photo to me. This printer did exceptionally > well with the VM inks, no printer induced "artifacting" that I could > detect - banding, etc... > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: 1280 vs. 2000P Question
2001-11-19 by grdglass@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.