Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: 1280 vs. 2000P Question

2001-11-19 by grdglass@aol.com

Terry,

Just to clarify...are you saying that you have used the MIS VM inks with the 
2000P?
If so, how did you do it and with which curves?

Helene 


> When you consider the 2000P has 7 picoliter heads and the 1280 has 4, 
> it is amazing just how smooth the 2000P is in comparing prints. Yes 
> you can look at them under a loupe and the 1280 will look better 
> (esp. at 2880), but at a standard viewing distance the 2000P looks 
> more like a "traditional" photo to me. This printer did exceptionally 
> well with the VM inks, no printer induced "artifacting" that I could 
> detect - banding, etc...
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.