After seeing a friend sign his gorgeous print (that he paid dearly for) with a gold paint marker, I could never really take him or his work seriously any longer. The printed archival statements and copyright info just sound silly, but I can understand the rational. However it seems that this would somehow cheapen or mechanize the fine art aspects of the work. I wonder if we strip down the Mona Lisa we will find an archival ranting and copyright. The work should always be about the image, not your pretty handwriting. I only sign prints on the reverse, maybe its a marketing mistake - but there have been no complaints from galleries or potential buyers. Don --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > What do people use to sign RC prints? My HB pencil doesn't work so well > ;-)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Signing RC prints
2005-02-24 by hill14701
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.