That's been my expreience also for several years with Somerset with either color or monochrome. It is a nice paper for delicate color work or soft black and white work where real dmax isn't needed. It must have something to do with the absorbant nature of the paper and the coating that is down in that soft cotton paper. For textured prints I use William Turner which I think is a great paper, significantly textured but with a crisp black and sharp resolution. Somerset if very durable though. John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@e...> wrote: > > The prints are ok, but not quite there. Does anyone else have > > experience with this paper -- which I like quite a bit -- and UT-2 > > inks? > > Steve, > > I don't have experience with exactly your set-up, but I've tried with the > Ultratone Easy inks and the C86. > > You've expressed my conclusion ... The prints are ok, but not quite there. > > I thought I'd give it a second try just last week, but this time with > Somerset Enhanced Satin. I like the surface better than Velvet, but I > still don't get good blacks. > > Daniel Ridings > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2005
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Somerst Velvet Enhanced
2005-02-27 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.