Ken, I don't use Optical so I don't know the 'ins and outs' of that software. I use an Eye One and ProfileMaker. But, I can offer a few suggestions. In general, the useful life for most CRTs is about 3 years, at least for critical color work. For B&W, it should be longer, since color is not the main issue. The phosphors in a CRT get 'tired' after awhile, especially if the monitor is kept at a high brightness level, which causes it to go dimmer faster. You can sometimes extend the useful life of your CRT by using a lower resolution (ie, 800x600 instead of 1024x768) or by using a lower refresh rate. But, when a decent software package won't allow you to hit the target levels, it usually means the phosphors are losing their umph. This makes it hard to get the dynamic range you need for accurate viewing. Good LCDs for graphics work are generally still quite pricey (typically above $1000 - $1500). I still use a CRT for that reason, but have been doing some looking around and will eventually make the switch. Eizo's and Apple Cinema displays are expensive. You may want to check out the LaCie and Samsung LCD's. They have gotten some good reviews and recommendations. Low end LCD's are great for video games and general use, but nearly useless for graphics work. Cheap ones are a nightmare to profile, and the results are NOT good. In general, expect to spend AT LEAST $600 or more for a decent LCD. If you do mostly B&W work and are able to get a good monitor to print match without resorting to extraordinary measures, you may just want to keep on using it. Regards, Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Ken Carney" <kcarney1@c...> wrote: > I have a Sony 21" Multiscan E500 monitor. When profiling with Optical 3.7 > Pro, I cannot get the brightness levels low enough, nor the contrast levels > high enough. I have tried experimenting with the bias controls in addition > to the gain controls for RGB, with no better results. The b&w prints (Epson > 2200 with OEM inks and IP6, on PR 308) look good, but it bothers me that the > monitor is not within the range that Optical wants. So I have two questions: > > A. Is this common, or is my E500 just not up to the task (it is about four > to five years old)? > > B. If the answer is to retire the E500, is there an LCD monitor that is as > good as a CRT for B&W, especially in the shadow areas? I'm less concerned > with cost (within whatever reason goes with this hobby) than accuracy and > consistency. > > Thanks as always for any advice. > > Regards, > > --Ken Carney > www.kencarney.com
Message
Re: Monitor profiling question
2005-02-28 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.