> > > I used imagesetter, LVT, and Fujix Pictography (OHT) internegatives. I > liked the 8x10 400 ppi Pictography internegs the best. They held up quite > well at 16 x 20, were cheap, and had virtually no artifacts. Finding a good > service bureau, however, is a requirement. > > Enjoy the journey. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > If you guys are into that kind of stuff I¹m going to really be happy about being here. That¹s my new frontier. Another way I¹d like to combine my digital work and darkroom work is to get a scanner which can scan an image off an 11x14 print which is my darkroom default. That way after spending all night in the darkroom I can have something to show for all that sweat when I come upstairs to my office with my digital stuff in it. I¹ve had good luck scanning prints some may find that heresy over scanning from an original need but I¹m not sure. Often its what you don¹t think! :) Here¹s a scan I made off an 8x10 darkroom print. (not that someone would scan from an inkjet does that happen!!!?!) http://rabinergroup.com/ImagePages/CouponWall630.html Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon http://rabinergroup.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] New guy Alert!
2005-03-01 by Mark Rabiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.