Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] New guy Alert!

2005-03-01 by Mark Rabiner

> 
> 
> I used imagesetter, LVT, and Fujix Pictography (OHT) internegatives.  I
> liked the 8x10 400 ppi Pictography internegs the best.  They held up quite
> well at 16 x 20, were cheap, and had virtually no artifacts.  Finding a good
> service bureau, however, is a requirement.
> 
> Enjoy the journey.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
If you guys are into that kind of stuff I¹m going to really be happy about
being here. That¹s my new frontier.

Another way I¹d like to combine my digital work and darkroom work is to get
a scanner which can scan an image off an 11x14 print which is my darkroom
default. 
That way after spending all night in the darkroom I can have something to
show for all that sweat when I come upstairs to my office with my digital
stuff in it. I¹ve had good luck scanning prints some may find that heresy
over scanning from an original need but I¹m not sure.
Often its what you don¹t think! :)

Here¹s a scan I made off an 8x10 darkroom print. (not that someone would
scan from an inkjet does that happen!!!?!)
http://rabinergroup.com/ImagePages/CouponWall630.html

Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.