Tom, You wrote: >I've never seen anything that stated that greater than 360 dpi would >produce better output, but I have seen claims that the Piezo driver >either printed at 2100-2200 on an 1160. These are two different sets of numbers. The 360 dpi is the image file at printing size. I use 360 dpi as my standard. That is, in Photoshop I like my files to be 360 dpi when they are at the size I intend to print. Some do say that they can see a difference in 720 dpi files. I've tried both and doubt most people can detect the differences at all. The higher "resolution" that you see -- 720x1440, or Piezo's "2160" -- refers to the dot pattern being laid down. These printers are actually only able to print about 10 line pairs/mm in terms of visual information. That could be done with 500 dots per inch. As a practical matter the printers have about hit the wall at 7.2 lp/mm. That is the maximum resolution of a 360 dpi image file at printing size. That is why I don't bother with larger files. But I do print at 1440 because it give smoother output. >I can tell you that when Piezo isn't clogging the print head, it >really produces some smooth toned images... That is, in part, due to the high, 2160 "resolution," and also due to the fact that it is partitioning inks -- putting only the lightest inks in the highlights. Interestingly, the VM-Sepia-Neutral that I'm working on is a bit smoother at 5% than Piezo in my 1160 when the neutral curve is used. This inkset has a neutral base ink. Thus, the "neutral" curve withholds all toner in the highlights. As such, it is just the light gray in the 5% patch. This might indicate that the partitioning of the inks is the major source of Piezo smoothness, not the 2160 dot pattern. >Unfortunately, it clogs a lot. I'm trying to figure out why and have several theories. > I just ordered some MIS FS ink to try that on the 1160 with the >Piezo driver (a real advantage is that the Piezo driver prints in >about 1/3 the time of the Epson driver). Really, on the 3000 I hear the latest Piezo driver is very slow. I know many like the Piezo driver. That is why I'll have ink formulas for both the VM and Piezo workflows. I would guess MIS will produce those that appear to be highly demanded. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VT with Paul's curves
2001-11-20 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.