Lick your thumb and forefinger (don't slobber). Then grab a corner of the paper where you won't be printing between your wet thumb and forefinger. The stickier side is the printable side. In most cases, but not all, the whiter side is the side you print on. I prefer the wet finger test. Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "B. Ellis" <bellis60@v...> wrote: > "Velvet is one of the hardest to discern for me (probably), so I'm very > careful how I remove the paper from the pack." > > Me too, and I isomehow managed to lose the instructions that come with the > paper so I don't know which side from the box is the correct side. I can see > that one side looks a little rougher or coarser than the other. Which is the > correct side for printing? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Diane Fields" <picnic@c...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 12:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: QTR surprises.... > > > > Thanks for addressing that--I was never sure if the double sided papers were > coated or not (had I looked further at inkjetart.com I would have realized > this--at least ones like Hahnemuhle PHotorag which I use single sided). I > have used non-coated art papers in the past--primarily with my 1280. I > bought a sample pack from Inkjetart a good while back--still may have some > (some Arches papers, maybe a Somerset, etc.). However, with the 2200 which > I've used as my primary printer for over 2 years I have stuck to just a few > papers which I find good (which are coated, I know)--and I certainly do know > that the papers, even with good paper profiles and color printing-- or > montone-- will affect the print--warmer, cooler, etc.--Thus why I'm > surprised, I don't know--except perhaps I thought a RIP would handle this > differently since printing directly out of PS/paper profile and not using > the RIP DID give me a quite 'neutral' print--or at least a much cooler > version. > > Using this RIP, however, seems to push me to start over, more or less, to > find the best curves for its use. Using PS/paper profiles I generally > 'toned' my prints slightly (duotones or otherwise) to sneak by (hopefully) > the metamerism issue. I've been considering making the 1280 a dedicated b/w > printer for several years, but if I can arrive at curves/presets I like > without metamerism I think this is the better way for me to go (QTR). I > print a good bit but to keep 2 Epson printers going (for me that seems to > mean printing a fair amount--which has kept my printers pretty much clog > free) may mean more printing that I'm doing at present--and backup of more > inks than I want to do. > > As far as printing on the wrong side--I've done that in the past LOL--Velvet > is one of the hardest to discern for me (probably), so I'm very careful how > I remove the paper from the pack. EEM is one of the easier papers to > tell--but I get your point about printing on a coated and non- coated paper. > > Thanks for your input--this list is always worthwhile for the good info. I > change my email preferences off and on since its often quite busy and when > I'm not getting single emails or digest, forget to read daily and lose > track--altho' recent reading is what brought my attention to QTR.. > > Diane > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Scott Graham > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:49 AM > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: QTR surprises.... > > > > To address just one of your points: > > all inkjet paper is coated. Only printing on a watercolor paper (i.e. > blotter actually used for > watercolor) will avoid a coating. We commonly call "nice art papers" > watercolor paper but > they aren't literally. > > and coatings certainly make a difference: color of the coating is the > obvious, but the way > they absorb (or not) various inks, etc. > > To demo that, when your EEM comes in, print a test on the front, and then > one on the > back (uncoated and diff color) of a sheet. What a difference, and if you > it withour realizing > it like I did once, what confusion :) > > Scott > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
[Digital BW] Re: QTR surprises....
2005-03-06 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.