There's a difference between printmaking and photography. They both have their merits. "Purism" doesn't relate. Digital printing, like Ansel's work, often seems more like serigraphy or etching than like photography...to me. I knew AA slightly, and a little of how he worked. He wasn't especially focused on instants, he was more into control and projection of his vision. More often photography has to do with instants in time, while by necessity printmaking has to do with labor over a period of time. Apples, oranges. Both might involve preconceptions, but the time factor is more than incidental. I think it's destructive to continually drive toward the ultimate technical control (CSII is coming! EEEK!) because that makes the activity, photography or printing, acquisative and consumerist. That's precisely what Macbeth, Microsoft, Macintosh, and Adobe have in mind. Unless you're a purist who believes in doing nothing to an image > after capture, each version of PS provides new and useful tools. > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:pderocco@i...
Message
[Digital BW] Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography
2005-03-07 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.