Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

different B&W Forum?

2005-03-09 by Djon

Seth, Go easy on Anthony. Not his fault. 

Who would take "offense" at expressions of disinterest in CS's
goshdarn wonderfulness? OK: to the Adobe Mothers among us, I apologize.

I posed the CS "justification" question on the wrong Forum: this isn't
intended a "photography" Forum after all. It's for digital
printmakers. Printmaking's just as important as photography, just
different.

A "B&W Digital Photography" Forum might help: discussion of images and
image production...

...minimizing braggadocio, such as proclamations of personal
superiority by CS devotees over the trailer trash that somehow manages
to make images with earlier releases. 

John


> Anthony-
> 
> How about giving it a rest!!!
> 
> Even using the term "real photography" is argumentative and offensive.
> 
> I think all understand your view by now.
> 
> Seth 
> 
> ==-----Original Message-----
> ==From: Anthony G. Atkielski [mailto:anthony@a...] 
> 
> ==Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: I don't know a justification 
> ==for CS in real photography
> ==
> ==
> ==Carolyn Frayn writes:
> ==
> ==> You lumped an entire user base into two categories.
> ==
> ==The reality is that the entire user base does fall roughly

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.