Digital BW, The Print

> Anthony-
> 
> How about giving it a rest!!!
> 
> Even using the term "real photography" is argumentative and offensive.
> 
> I think all understand your view by now.
> 
> Seth 
> 
> ==-----Original Message-----
> ==From: Anthony G. Atkielski [mailto:anthony@a...] 
> 
> ==Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: I don't know a justification 
> ==for CS in real photography
> ==
> ==
> ==Carolyn Frayn writes:
> ==
> ==> You lumped an entire user base into two categories.
> ==
> ==The reality is that the entire user base does fall roughly

> From: Carolyn Frayn <carolyn@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:06:08 -0700
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] different B&W  Forum?
> 
> 
> On 3/9/05 8:09 AM, "Djon" sent the following verbage:
> 
>> 
>> Seth, Go easy on Anthony. Not his fault.
>> 
>> Who would take "offense" at expressions of disinterest in CS's
>> goshdarn wonderfulness? OK: to the Adobe Mothers among us, I apologize.
> 
> Oh brother.
> 
>> 
>> A "B&W Digital Photography" Forum might help: discussion of images and
>> image production...
>> 
>> ...minimizing braggadocio, such as proclamations of personal
>> superiority by CS devotees over the trailer trash that somehow manages
>> to make images with earlier releases.
> 
> Thanks for totally misunderstanding.
> 
> C