The bottom line is none means none - seriously you are not meant to use "none". You are meant to use one or a blend of two - none is there to simply fill the gap ie a second curve is redundant if using 100-0 mix (or 0-100). You would have to ask Roy what happens when you tell it not to use a curve. BUT this is not the intended use of the product. > From: Diane Fields <picnic@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:13:33 -0500 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Inks used for QTR > > > Thanks Carolyn. That confirms, more or less, what I thought--that there must > be a very large amount of the black and grey UC inks used in QTR since I knew > they were 'warm' (having tried the BO method several years ago). I've found a > nice blend that comes up to a fairly neutral print on the EEM, but may have to > adjust as EEM is usually only my 'test' paper. I generally print on Velvet > and HPR and I haven't tried those papers yet since I've just been demoing QTR. > I'll print on Velvet today to confirm my thoughts on QTR (which is excellent > and I'm ready to send Roy my Paypal share *smile*). > > What has been harder for me to get my head around (altho' I know it > 'intellectually') is that when I print from a color managed PS environment, my > print matches my calibrated monitor (but, unfortunately, with metamerism)--- > but when printing with QTR and using gray-lab, gray-matte, my 'NONE' is a warm > toned print. Now I do understand that QTR uses primarily MK and LB (warm > toned) and am saving blends for each of my papers since I also understand the > tone of the paper influences the print (and am also glad to have confirmed > that the cooler profiles bring the color inks into play). I guess I just > wanted to be sure I understood what 'none' meant. > > Diane > -----------
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Inks used for QTR
2005-03-11 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.