> But arguably one could make a "dye" ink of very small carbon particles.... My understanding is that dyes are soluble and pigments are not. Only if you consider molecules to be particles do the two meet. I believe the carbon that is used in the black ink is mostly graphite. Graphite is insoluble in water. See http://www.hummelcroton.com/data/grph_d.html But, it is true that the particle size is probably the most important distinction. It is also my understanding that the dye printers can use low loads of very finely ground pigment. Apparently one thing that limits the non-Epson desktop printers in this regard is the viscosity of the inks. The piezo-electric head that Epson has rather well protected with patents may be the only one that can pump the high-viscosity base needed to keep high loads of larger particles in suspension. So, for example, the dye inkset blacks may well have carbon particles in them. But, there will be a relatively low load (relative amount of pigment per volume or weight), and the particles have to be very finely ground. (The smaller the particle, the lower the viscosity needed to keep it in suspension.) The good dmax they get comes from the dyes that are added, and the composition of these is unknown to me. They used to be color pigments, particularly cyan. (That is where the PKN concept came from.) Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] What is actually in Ultrachrome inks?
2005-03-11 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.