I'm not taking sides on the film/digital debate, but whether a CD will last 300 years really isn't the issue. The issue is whether anyone will have a CD reader in 20 years. Consider that 8 track tapes, 78 rpm records and 8" floppies are already a problem. It really doesn't matter if it is digital or analog; the issue is the technology required to retrieve the information and the availability of that technology. I know a large research library that has been scanning all its art for years. They recently started archiving to DVD, and at the same time are converting all their earlier CD archives to DVD. They figure they will go through this process -- converting their entire archive to a newer technology -- every ten years. I also have contacts within the film/movie studio world. They know how to save film for 50 or 100 years. They are still scratching their heads about digital.
Message
Archiving digital -- it's not the media, it's the device
2005-03-17 by Blaine Cavena
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.