Andrei, THANK YOU - I'm still chuckling What is it about some folks who can't accept that we are all different, like different products for different reasons and that that is something we should celebrate - not condemn! That's why I - just like you keep using MY crap - although it's not the same crap as yours..=*^) Hang in there! Christer Christer, AKA Christer Rosewell http://www.ChristerArt.com On Mar 17, 2005, at 4:41 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote: > Subject: Re: the contax toast/film thingy > > Hi Jack > > I have been a long time user of the G1 crap, as you say. > I then upgraded to the G2 crap, which is obviously more expensive. > What I liked about the G crap is that it was light and compact, > nice for travelling, you can have the full complement of lenses in > your pockets. I used the crap to shoot slide film, which as you > know has little latitude for exposure. I was content with the crap > except of course the slow focus, I was aware though I would not > be getting a sports event Canon or Nikon. > I must admit that I'm a bit of a snob, in that I like titanium finish > crap, which is well built. Maybe it was me, but I rarely got out > of focus pictures. > Besides being a snob and flaunting that logo about, I used > the crap because it allowed me to mount some of the sharpest > lenses around, bar none. Had I been better off, I would've used > the Leica crap, for the same reasons shown above. > I for one will miss it. > > Cheers ! > > Andrei [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Re: the contax toast/film thingy
2005-03-17 by Christer Rosewelll
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.