For what it's worth I find the MIS magenta UC equivalent inks to be really bad - both M and LM. I get continual bad clogs even with the new carts. The other inks are not nearly as bad. > From: Andrei Aderca <aderca@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:02:21 -0500 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 1280 w Pigmnet clogs, was: Epson 2200 & switching > inks > > > Bob > > Your experience matches mine to a large extent, this is one of the > reasons why I upgraded > to a 2200. I used a 1280 with CIS for about 6 months and found the > clogging to get > worse, especially on the black nozzle. Tried every method in the book > with Windex, > also unplugging the CIS and using dye carts to try getting a clean > nozzle check is also > a pain- so I guess that from this point of view, using the EZ fill carts > at least makes it > less painful when you have a stubborn clog. I am not sure either that > the issue is in the > cart design, my 1280 is now retired, I acquired the printhead > installation software but > I'm still considering whether it is worth putting in a new printhead, > given that I would not > use it for anything else except pigment. > The old printhead had build-up on the black nozzle, or spigot, don't > know exactly how > to call that part, but it's a little plastic piece which is cone shaped, > with minute holes in it. > I could not remove it with Windex and really did not want to consider > anything else more > drastic. > I also have a C84 and it seems more robust in terms of clogging, must > be the printhead > design for Durabrite inks. > Just a silly remark but could be that the spongeless EZ carts keep the > spigots in the head > "whetted" to a better extent than the conventional design. > > Regards > > Andrei > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 1280 w Pigmnet clogs, was: Epson 2200 & switching inks
2005-03-26 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.