Jerry Olson wrote: > Also Photo matte is now about the same price as epson's archival matte. > There is no logo on the back, it is whiter than epson, and thicker than > epson. Great blacks too, if you use paul roark's curves but substitute > the backlight film setting for heavyweight matte. Jerry; I saw you Bicklight film setting tip and decided to give it a try. I took a portrait image file that I had recently made a nice print of using VM on an 1160 <warm neutral curve> on LPM using the "matte paper -heavyweight setting" Using the Backlight film setting... the printer sure did lay down a good black but the mid tones where all solarized and the highlights where all blown out. I thought something had gone terribly wrong with my printer! I then switched the Epson driver setting to "Matte paper- heavyweight" my usual setting for LPM, and out came a perfect print! Strange.... -Jeff
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Backlight film setting
2001-11-27 by Jeff Magidson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.