> photokit sharpener and Neat Image Steve, I've been using PK Sharpner for more than a year mostly for color work. It takes some getting use to at first and expands your file size apprecialy, but it's a very useful tool. As for Neat Image, I'm on a Mac, so I've never used it (stop laughing, Lou). Here are some links on sharpening workflow and PK-S to check out. They are authored by Bruce Fraser (who developed PK-S). The first link provides background to the development of PK-S and the second is available on the pixelgenius web site as their manual. http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/20357-1.html http://www.pixelgenius.com/sharpener/manual.html FWIW, I don't always use the Inkjet Output Sharpen in PK-S and instead opt for Deadman's Sharpeners (Custom Sharpener) for my final sharpening pass: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/links.html As Diane mentioned, you'll want to consider masking, especially during the "creative sharpen" step in your workflow. I do use the sharpening brushes, which provide added flexibility, but I do this less so than masking because I make mostly landscape images and don't need a lot of localized sharpening. > noise reduction For noise reduction, you might consider another Photokit product... http://www.pixelgenius.com/photokit/index.html or the action set here called "De-noise Deluxe 1.2"... http://www.2morrow.dk/75ppi/coolpix/actions/ I use both of these. De-noise Deluxe is a bit of a sledge hammer, but you can manage changes as you go and experiment until you've got it dialed in. Photokit (different than PK Sharpener) is another useful series of action sets. The Noise Reduction set (1, 2 &3) allows you to apply changes incrementally but otherwise offers no control beyond limiting opacity and fill or using masks. Both PK and De-Noise Deluxe have their strengths and shortcoming. Together, they're really nice to have. Good luck! Mark
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Off topic: photokit and neat image.
2005-03-27 by Mark Carstens
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.