Phil: This seems to be a case where it's just a lot simpler to follow the crowd, use the existing inksets, use the existing workflows, use the existing problem solutions, and rely on the existing infrastructure then to start from scratch with a handful of similar independent minded folks using something other than Epson printers. I just want good prints and to make them the easiest way. I don't want to try to duplicate the several years efforts of a lot of people with a different printer. HP may make better printers than Epson for all I know. But it's easier to make good prints with an Epson because of the infrastructure. I think we all have our strong streaks of individuality. I just prefer to exercize mine in the content of my images rather than how I print them. Watch a bunch of photojournalists shooting sometime. Notice they are all shooting Nikon or Canon gear. Is that because they are the best? No, not at all. It's just because of the support and the fact that if they need to borrow a lens or body, that's what everyone else has. A related situation exists with printers. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pdcorlis" <pdcorlis@a...> wrote: > I understand this is mostly an Epson/MIS forum and I've been getting great results with my > little C86+MIS EZ - but I'm willing to explore all options before I spend money on a bigger > printer.
Message
Re: Why not HP?
2005-03-27 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.