Also with HP you change print heads with each cartridge which means they are cheap enough to be replaceable "for free" which is not the same as super high quality; just can't be no matter how hard they try and this also means that cartridge to cartridge color (or B&W) calibration must vary more than if the heads are not changed. and HP has traditionally focused on speed and "engineering drawing" quality rather than fine art. Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Louis Dina" <lbdina@c...> wrote: > > In a nutshell, there aren't many quad ink options are available for > HP printers. Due to longevity concerns, most of us want to use > pigment inks for our work (ie, Epson printers), and most other > printers use dye inks. Putting pigment inks into a printer designed > for dyes can sometimes result in clogging. > > So, that leaves most non-Epson printer users with the standard OEM > inkset, which generally requires a RIP or some other 3rd party > solution to get decent monochrome output. Most of the inexpensive > RIPs don't support HP or Canon printers for archival reasons > mentioned above. You have to spend a lot more money for a RIP that > offers good monochrome support. > > Not a thorough answer, but it seems to be the state of affairs at the > present time. It will probably change some as the other printer > companies come up with better offerings, which seems to be happening. > > Lou > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pdcorlis" > <pdcorlis@a...> wrote: > > > > I asked a similar question before - but didn't get many takers, so > if you'll allow me I'll ask > > it again. > > > > With Wihlem "numbers" for glossy paper (my preference) framed and > glassed at 100+ > > years, no clogging problems, and a printer price equal to or lower > than Epson's - why not > > > > > Phil C.
Message
Re: Why not HP?
2005-03-28 by Scott Graham
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.