Digital BW, The Print

Also why Clayton's methodology works nicely and isn't inappropriate.
He's simply using one of those already worked out, highly technical
results of industrial wizardry that someone else took the trouble and
$ to pursue first. Kinda like buying sliced bread and thinking it's
really ok to eat it instead of baking your own.

He also paid for it along with Pshop:)

Regards
Duane

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@t...> wrote:
> 
> of course, that's what I was trying to get at without the tech stuff...
> Should have worked.
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale
> <stevekale@b...> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > From: Tyler Boley <tyler@t...>
> > 
> > > 
> > > I'm very suprised actually, with a 21 step file open, if I
assign 2.2
> > > I can barely distinguish 95% from 100%, if I assign Roy's lab, it
> > > opens right up. It's a dramatic difference.
> > > I wonder what could be different there, and can see why you
might have
> > > discounted it if you don't see what I see here.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Look at the respective L figures of the steps.  Assign a different
> profile
> > and you are assigning a completely different luminance to the
particular
> > step.