Scott, > > " Xtol is that it is environmentally much more benign than the older > developers." > > If I remember correctly, Xtol is citric acid based. Yes. It seems to have about the finest grain for a full speed developer, in part because there is almost no chemical sharpening (adjacency effect). I considered this terrible in the darkroom, with no easy unsharp masking, but with the computer, I think low grain may be the better goal. Sharpening an image seems to be easier than smoothing out the grain and unevenness that results from dilute, compensating, high edge effect developers. So, I took a roll of Tmax 100 and will develop it in Xtol to see how it scans and looks. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT... - Weston would agree?
2005-04-17 by Paul Roark