At 04:22 AM 4/23/2005, John Bergholm wrote: >Just my opinion, but it seems to me that using fancy words like giclee >or carbon pigment prints is an attempt at covering up and "hiding" the >fact that we are making inkjet prints - why, because we are embarassed >by our media? i refuse to buy into the gelatin silver crowd's >ascertion that inkjet prints aren't worthy. make your prints the >absolute best they can be and call them 'archival inkjet prints' with >pride. only when we've proven the quality of our printing will the >term begin to carry a more positive connotation. On the use of the word "giclee", I agree. It's pretentious and meaningless. Also, it's been coopted by artists who use it to mean a digital copy of a painting. I call my photographic prints "Inket carbon prints" and "Inkjet pigment prints". In both cases, I want to differentiate the medium from what is produced from a simple inkjet printer with dye based inks that will fade quickly. I believe that the words I use are meaningful and accurate. And if they start a discussion ... then good. Buyers of my prints should be confident that the prints will last, that the ink won't fade or the paper crumble. Buyers are interested to learn that my black and white prints are actually composed of real grays as well as black, and that different color pigments have different characteristics. A r t h u r F i n k P h o t o g r a p h y -------------------------------------------------- Ten New Island Avenue 207.766.5722 cell 615.5722 Peaks Island, Maine 04108 arthur@...
Message
What we call our prints (Was "Great New Group ... Giclee ...")
2005-04-23 by Arthur Fink
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.