Scott, >Just wanted to thank all for their thoughtful responses. Lots >more digital capture and less negative scanning than I would >have anticipated. Lots of food for thought. There is certainly a lot less discussion about scanning than there was 3 years ago. The digicam technology has improved so much since then that it is steadily and relentlessly, like a glacier, taking over. Most likely, one by one, often without fanfare, individual photographers are reaching that point where they give it a try, like what they find, and begin their own personal transformation. It can't be stopped or slowed, any more than the automobile could in horse and buggy days. It happened to me. I thought I'd never switch. But once I tried it I was hooked and the process was set in motion. I'll never forget when I bought my first el cheapo P&S digicam (a Kodak no less, the digital equivalent of the Kodak Brownie, my first film camera on my 8th birthday), took it on a trip, and shot with complete abandon with no concern about film/processing costs and/or hours in the darkroom. It was a revelation. It's only a matter of time. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] What do forum folks use most for image capture?
2005-04-24 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.