Daniel, Now I am a little confused. I am using the UC inkset in a 2200. Are you saying the density of ALL INKS relate back to equivalent K patch with the same density, regardless of color? I was under the impression (perhaps a false one) that you would do the following: LK density is based on the density of the equivalent patch of the K ink. C, M and Y inks would not have any density input (left blank). LC density is based on the equivalent density patch of the Cyan ink. LM density is based on the equivalent density patch of the Magenta ink. Is this right or wrong? Thanks, Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Staver <daniel@p...> wrote: > The numbers are written on the inkseparation image. If 100% M has the > same density as 43% K then the number for M is 43. In other words you > move up or down the K scale until you find a patch that matches the > density of 100% of the ink you're working with. That K percentage is > your value. Repeat for the other inks. > > Like with the ink limits there is plenty room for error here. An > approximate guess is enough. The linearization will take care of any > remaining problems. > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no
Message
Re: [Digital BW] My first QTR paper curve---HELP!!
2005-04-24 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.