meander@... wrote: > > BTW, years ago, on the leben epson list, there was a long discussion > on what to call "whateveryouwanttocallemcarboninkjet prints". The > members coined two words, piezograph and piezography. If my memory is > correct someone then trade marked one of those words. So piezograph > must still be in public domain. A lot easier to spell than > whateveryouwanttocallemcarbonorhybriddyeinkjet prints. > The Brooklyn Museum Of Art, which had a huge digital show this summer called all the inkjet prints (with different types of inks, dithers, & rips) 'Inkjet Print'. So if you are trying to be informational, you should call them 'Inkjet Prints', with perhaps an addition of the type of ink. Like 'Pigment Inkjet Print', or 'Dye-based Inkjet Print' etc. If you are looking for a marketing ploy, the the world is your oyster in the naming department. But academically they are 'inkjet prints'. Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Beyond the name: selling prints/ cross posted
2001-12-02 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.