Carl, I have not done any stitching with the XT images yet. I've done it with film scans, however. I know it works, but it is work also. Ideally, I'd like to have all the information in a single frame. Paul www.PaulRoark.com > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl > Schofield > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:02 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sigma lenses & Canon Digital cameras > > > Paul, > > Have you tried using your 50 or 85 on the Rebel XT to shoot a matrix of > overlapping shots for stitching? You can get quite a gain in effective > resolution for making large prints. > > Carl > > On Apr 27, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Paul Roark wrote: > > > > > > > Clayton, > > > > > >> ... my question to Paul was not > >> theoretical. I'm asking him what has been his practical experience so > >> far. > > > > > > I did some shooting with the Rebel XT, comparing the 18 - 55mm zoom > > that > > comes with it to my old 50mm f1.8 standard Canon EF (cheap but very > > good) > > lens. In the lab, the resolution tests made it appear the zoom was > > about as > > good as the 50mm. In actual photos today, the 50mm looked > > significantly > > better. The 50mm was very good at f4 and excellent from f5.6 on. The > > zoom > > could only match the 50mm at the center at f11. > > > > The real problem with the zoom was at the edges, especially in the dark > > greenery. The best the zoom could do at the edges was not as good as > > the > > 50mm at f2.8. I'm not sure why it looked so much worse in the field > > than > > lab. I suspect higher flare contributed to wiped out the shadow > > details. > > > > So, I've made a full circle on the lenses. I'm back to wishing my 24mm > > Sigma worked. I may buy a 24 Canon, and use it and my 50mm. It > > doesn't > > look like using the cheap zoom is going to be a fair test of what an 8 > > mp > > camera can do. I would not consider a cheap zoom for my film use, so > > why > > should digital be any different? (I'm not totally anti zoom. My 50 - > > 200 L > > and Fuji Zi zooms are outstanding. I'm not, however, ready to drop > > $800 for > > the 10 - 22 until I'm more convinced this digital approach is going to > > satisfy me.) > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Sigma lenses & Canon Digital cameras
2005-04-28 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.