--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon" <westsidemaurice@y...> wrote: > In my journey to fine B&W from Nikon V-scanned B&W negs I've been > playing with an image that never printed well in 1975 using a fine > Durst and Agfa Brovira...Tmax (never liked that stuff). Important > personal image. > > So far I've gotten best results scanning as POSITIVE, then inverting, > filtering dust & scratches (PS7), applying light USM, increasing > contrast (the pos scan is very flat). Print QTRgui/2200. > > I'm getting more life (midtone separation) in shadow-sides of faces > than I have so far when scanning as negative...the overall image > appears sharper, with less USM, because certain tones aren't muddled. > > Scanning B&W negs as pos is often suggested... helps with this > image...any idea WHY this works, if in your experience it does? Hi; I too have a Nikon scanner, and scan as positives; this gives you all the information from the scan which you can then massage to your liking. If you scan as a negative, the software sets black point/ white point and contrast curve, and for a B&W neg it just doesn't work well. does a bit better for color negs though. Steve Karafyllakis
Message
Re: scan B&W as neg...WHY?
2005-05-03 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.