Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: scan B&W as neg...WHY?

2005-05-03 by Steven Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon" 
<westsidemaurice@y...> wrote:
> In my journey to fine B&W from Nikon V-scanned B&W negs I've been
> playing with an image that never printed well in 1975 using a fine
> Durst and Agfa Brovira...Tmax (never liked that stuff). Important
> personal image. 
> 
> So far I've gotten best results scanning as POSITIVE, then inverting,
> filtering dust & scratches (PS7), applying light USM, increasing
> contrast (the pos scan is very flat). Print QTRgui/2200.
> 
> I'm getting more life (midtone separation) in shadow-sides of faces
> than I have so far when scanning as negative...the overall image
> appears sharper, with less USM, because certain tones aren't muddled. 
> 
> Scanning B&W negs as pos is often suggested... helps with this
> image...any idea WHY this works, if in your experience it does?

Hi; I too have a Nikon scanner, and scan as positives; this gives you 
all the information from the scan which you can then massage to your 
liking. If you scan as a negative, the software sets black point/ white 
point and contrast curve, and for a B&W neg it just doesn't work well. 
does a bit better for color negs though.

Steve Karafyllakis

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.