Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: B&W / 35mm negs / SUCCESS!

2005-05-04 by Don

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon"
<westsidemaurice@y...> wrote:
> I have finally arrived at 35mm scanned B&W that EASILY (cookbook)looks
> better than decades of optical B&Ws (eg condenser Durst). 
> 
> 1) Nikon V...4000ppi, excellent negative holder, fast (THANKS JAPAN!)
> 2) VueScan as TIFF (THANKS ED!)
> 3) Photoshop filter> "noise"> "dust/scratch" filter, avoiding soft
> grain(THANKS ADOBE!)
> 4) Minimal USM (4/3.1/64 with grainy-pushed Tmax400)..avoids fringe
> 5) Black-Only (THANKS CLAYTON!) or QTRgui (THANKS STEPHEN)
> 6) THANKS EPSON ! (2200,OEM pigments,EEM)
> 
>

I'm not quite sure I understand your settings for USM....;-)

Could you give the Amount, Radius, and Threshold?  Thanks.

By the way, I agree with many of your other findings!!

Don

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.