Todd, You wrote: >What we don't know is if the MIS inks will show >density variations over time too. I guess none of us, >regardless of inkset, run calibration strips each >morning to check consistency. In doing all this mixing, etc., I run a lot of test strips. So far, I have not seen any density fluctuations with MIS. (Aside from the + & - 1-2% that seems to be normal with these printers and inks.) I think it would be a good idea to run a 21-step and "color test" curve test strip and put them in dark storage to use as standards. If there was some suspected variation, we'd be better able to nail it down then. >What we don't know is if all inks settle/evaporate/change over time, I'm suspicious of both. The good pigments are supposed to be held in suspension by "Brownian motion," but I give a few inversion agitations before I mix new batches, just in case. I swirl my CIS ink bottles occasionally also. I'm suspicious of the strong smell of the co-solvent base used by Piezo and the MIS VM/FS black. I think it is relatively volatile and might be evaporating faster. That could increase the incidence of clogging and other problems. However, that black is so much better than the others, I'm willing to take the risk. Just be sure to turn off those printers when not in use for a long time. The truth is that all the big companies serving the mainstream consumers use dyes, not pigments. The problems with glossy paper are certainly part of the reason, but I'll bet these other issues are also relevant. But, its worth it. So far, the MIS inks appear to be doing fine. We are also talking about some things that might be done to make sure they continue to do fine, such as 1 micron filters in the CFS lines and cartridges. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] FS density mk2
2001-12-03 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.