1. Julian, Photo Eye takes 30% for commission and $10+ per image upfront for set-up. 2. John, I like those old Weston prints, but not all of them are perfect. The Fine Art museum in Boston has a huge collection and the quality varies as much as any photographer's pile of prints would vary. Maybe the old ones look good because they are starting to yellow a bit (I know they were mostly chlorabromide). I've seen plenty on non archival fiber prints. 3. Thank you Paul for your UV testing. Does the Legion Photo Matte yellow and fade like an old Weston print or does it simply begin to look like crap? I stopped using EAM because I don't like that Epson logo written all over the back. 4. OK Mark, I'm finished using the term "piezo." I could just as well use another stupid term like "giclee." I'll stick with "carbon pigment" and explain it to people if asked. I have a show next month at a local gallery and the director called and asked about my labelling the image on the post card "carbon pigment print." It is a two person show with a woman doing "monoprints." The director asked, "Are your images photographs or prints?" I guess if you put it that way, I'll return to calling them photographs. The show is simply called "Prints." 5. Ternahan, I guess a certificate of authentication makes sense as a gesture to the art buyer. I'll do mine on demand.. Frank http://www.culturalvisions.com
Message
Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-03 by frank@culturalvisions.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.