Thanks, Carl. What do you think of the color gamut, Dmax, etc? Is it as good as the UC inks? The MIS site claims implies better results on glossy paper (I'm assuming they means less bronzing). Have you compared profiles in a 3D gamut plotting program such as ColorThink? Thanks, Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> wrote: > Lou, > > Yes. I'm using MIS UC equivalents in my 4000. I also subsituted PKN > for PK and LKN (UT7 LK) for LK. I didn't bother flushing when I > switched, but I did print some purge files to hasten the transition. > Obviously you need to re-profile all of your papers, but not a big > problem. I bought two sets of empty carts and refill from bulk > inks. No clogging problems, but I haven't been using the MIS inks > very long (just starting to use my second set of inks). > > Carl > > On May 5, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Louis Dina wrote: > > > I was considering switching my Epson 4000 over to MIS UltraChrome > > equivalents, mainly for cost savings. > > > > Is anyone using these inks in a 4000? If so, how do you like them and > > how do they compare to the Epson UC inks? > > > > Do you buy the filled cartridges or refill your own? > > > > Any clogging, Dmax, color gamut, or other issues? > > > > Any fading or permanence problems? > > > > Any final words of advice or caution? > > > > Thanks alot, > > > > Lou > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Anyone using MIS UltraChrome Ink in a 4000?
2005-05-05 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.