Frank, You wrote: >3. Thank you Paul for your UV testing. Does the Legion Photo >Matte yellow and fade like an old Weston print or does it simply >begin to look like crap? ... Not being privileged enough to have both a dark-storage, control Weston, as well as, one that has been on display for many years, I'm not in a position to compare very closely. If somebody would be willing to ship said items to my Swiss bank account, I'd sure be willing take a look. (No return postage necessary.) My best estimate is that if Weston had used the best modern pigments and LPM, they would probably look better than any enlargements he might have made -- even today, with reasonable handling. (Of course, his contact prints would, no doubt, be another story. Did he do any enlargements?) So, to summarize, I haven't a clue about the comparison, but I like LPM in spite of its yellowing (which is probably caused largely by the brighteners that the UV from my fluorescent light fader is burning out at an accelerated rate). Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-03 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.