--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Timmermans" <zenphoto7@a...> wrote: Hi Tim; Having just bought an 1800 on Thursday and taken it back on Friday, I may have a bit better perspective on tis than most list members: > > Say you have to get a 13 x 19 printer. Your choices are the 2200 or > the 1800. Which do you choose and why? > > If you could get two printers would you get a 2200 for color and an > 1800 for BW? You've got it backwards here: The 1800 does the better color, especially with the premium profiles provided by Epson, but is worthless for B&W. The one I took back showed at least some banding at even the highest quality settings. At some point Paul Roark may work up a set of curves for it, and QTR may also support it, but until then you're stuck with either an expensive RIP or making do with the Epson driver for B&W. > What if you already had a 1280? Would you dedicate that to BW using a > CFS and if so, which of the other two would you get for color? > Do you need pigment color? if not, the 1280 does a good job with dyes, especially with a couple of custom profiles. It also has B&W support, and does a good job, but tends to require more cleaning and is more clog-prone than the 2200. > I also have a 2200 which I feel so-so about. I have a replacement > warranty on it so I could return it and get full store credit for it Most people doing B&W on a 2200 are very happy with them. The printer has wide support for b&w, a definite advantage. >> Would it make > sense to move up to a larger format printer? I have a 7600, care and feeding of the beast runs a good deal higher if you wind up doing mostly small prints anyway. I think about 20% of each cartridge gets wasted by those incessant cleaning cyles, and you can't put anything smaller than 8x10 through it. It is also slower, and has a coarser droplet size than the 2200, ie, forget doing Black Only unless you happen to be a 35mm Tri-X/Rodinal fan. If you're not sure you have a good market for the bigger prints, test the waters by paying for a couple bigger prints and see if they sell at your next show. If you decide to go up, probably the 4000 makes a logical next step up. If you're really itching to spend that money, I would wait a few weeks for the new generation to hit the market, I think Epson will make the announcement this week, so I heard. The new machines will finally address B&W printing, hopefully reasonably well. I hope this helps Steve Karafyllakis
Message
Re: Which would you choose?
2005-05-08 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.