Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Which would you choose?

2005-05-08 by Steven Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tim 
Timmermans" <zenphoto7@a...> wrote:
Hi Tim;
Having just bought an 1800 on Thursday and taken it back on Friday, 
I may have a bit better perspective on tis than most list members:

> 
> Say you have to get a 13 x 19 printer. Your choices are the 2200 or
> the 1800. Which do you choose and why?
> 
> If you could get two printers would you get a 2200 for color and an
> 1800 for BW?

You've got it backwards here: The 1800 does the better color, 
especially with the premium profiles provided by Epson, but is 
worthless for B&W. The one I took back showed at least some banding 
at even the highest quality settings. At some point Paul Roark may 
work up a set of curves for it, and QTR may also support it, but 
until then you're stuck with either an expensive RIP or making do 
with the Epson driver for B&W.

> What if you already had a 1280? Would you dedicate that to BW 
using a
> CFS and if so, which of the other two would you get for color?
> 
Do you need pigment color? if not, the 1280 does a good job with 
dyes, especially with a couple of custom profiles. It also has B&W 
support, and does a good job, but tends to require more cleaning and 
is more clog-prone than the 2200. 

> I also have a 2200 which I feel so-so about. I have a replacement
> warranty on it so I could return it and get full store credit for 
it

Most people doing B&W on a 2200 are very happy with them. The 
printer has wide support for b&w, a definite advantage.

>> Would it make
> sense to move up to a larger format printer? 

I have a 7600, care and feeding of the beast runs a good deal higher 
if you wind up doing mostly small prints anyway. I think about 20% 
of each cartridge gets wasted by those incessant cleaning cyles, and 
you can't put anything smaller than 8x10 through it. It is also 
slower, and has a coarser droplet size than the 2200, ie, forget 
doing Black Only unless you happen to be a 35mm Tri-X/Rodinal fan. 
If you're not sure you have a good market for the bigger prints, 
test the waters by paying for a couple bigger prints and see if they 
sell at your next show. If you decide to go up, probably the 4000 
makes a logical next step up.

If you're really itching to spend that money, I would wait a few 
weeks for the new generation to hit the market, I think Epson will 
make the announcement this week, so I heard. The new machines will 
finally address B&W printing, hopefully reasonably well.

I hope this helps

Steve Karafyllakis

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.