re: Vuescan Vs pos>inversion Helen, you've pursued the pos>inversion process far more intensively than I have, but as a former-longtime-silver-printer (FLSP) I prefere Vuescan (or Vuescan Pro). I'm lazy. Vuescan makes superb B&W scans VERY easy: fewer steps, no manipulation other than the usual post-processing for dust/scratches, USM, contrast/density etc. I'm amazed that Nikon didn't bundle my Nikon V with VueScan... A doubt: Comparing black-only enlargements from Vuescan TIFFs to inverted Nikonscan TIFFs of the same B&W neg, inverted TIFFs *noticably* lose sharpness, despite allegations that TIFFs are inherently lossless. I don't understand lossy TIFFs, but I don't understand much of this stuff anyway. Vuescan can be downloaded free for a trial run (browse Vuescan or Hamrick software)...it's watermarked but useful for testing... Djon > > All the methods I've read about export a negative image from > Nikonscan, > then invert later in Photoshop or whatever. It is easy to scan as a > positive and invert in Nikonscan by applying a reverse RGB curve. > Best, > Helen > rbara
Message
Re: [Digital BW] What do forum folks use most for image capture?
2005-05-10 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.