Paul Roark wrote: >One could also read the WIR notes as indicating the "new" UC K3 inks are >basically just UC inks, with the addition of the LLK and a lot of hype. > > > Given Wilhelm's notes and preliminary numbers there can't be much difference to the first UCs. But the gloss is better according to Joseph Holmes. The speed can be reduced to get gloss differential better he writes but the 4800 is already faster than the 4000 and certainly much faster than the 9600 so that's hardly the way to achieve that result. I guess the pigments are the same but there's a media change (glop added or whatever without sacrificing Dmax). He also describes some hue shifts for CM in the new inkset. He seems to be more familiar with the 10000CF than the first UC models but he must know what he is writing about. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 Inkset Permanence Rating
2005-05-15 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.