Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs. digital darkroom

2001-12-04 by Bernhard Ess

Julian, when scanning 6x6 with the 1680, how big are you getting really
sharp, good
prints without artefacts?

Greetings Bernhard

----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs.
digital darkroom


> For 35mm I use TriX souped in Xtol, scanned on a ss4000 using Vuescan. For
> mf (6x6 and 6x9) I use Delta 400 souped in DiXactol (wonderful new find)
and
> scanned on an Epson 1680Pro using Silverfast or Vuescan. I always scan
16bit
> Raw Image (16bit HDR in Silverfast) as I don't want any of those nasty
> filters getting between me and the neg. The dustspecs I use the stamping
> tool in PS.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.