Or is there a transform taking place as soon as we click on Advanced B&W Mode (ie not really Same as Source) in which case things would be done twice? > From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:53:22 +0100 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2400 beta tester report > > > An interesting report. Well we already know how to do the soft-proofing for > any given setting - Carl, give Bruce Fraser a call... > > The question I have is tone compression/management. This is effectively now > a black box in the Epson driver and not open to profiling with conventional > software - not good. There is no connection/colour management of tonal > compression from the workspace to the print space - change the workspace and > you'll get a different result. Much like Black Only printing. This is a > real shame. It would have been nice if there was a baseline per paper/ink > that had been profiled. At least then the CMM could be used to get you to a > known baseline for tweaking in the driver. > > Roy, perhaps it won't be long before we ask you to again brush off that > greyscale profile writer of yours! By measuring the output of the Epson > driver in B&W mode for a particular setting at least then we could "profile" > the luminance/reflectance axis. Then we can use the CMM with perceptual > intent to manage tonal compression at least. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2400 beta tester report
2005-05-17 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.