--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Chatzebussi, > > > > > I still have an old EPSON 1160 with just one "black"-nozzle not firing > > properly - I think that nozzle has gone for good. > > In addition to the usual cleaning recommendations, you might try a cleaning > cart and let it sit there, with occasional cleaning cycles, for a week or > more. > > > ... If I were to "upgrade" Ebony k with a > > "colour" cartridge for a different printing technique should I choose > > the "FS" oder the "FSN" version??? Put otherwise: is FS' or FSN's > > original/inherent "hue" nearer Ebony's mildly warm k??? > > FS is warmer than FSN and closer to Eboni's warm tone. I call FS medium > warm. > > > Why am I asking this question? The answer: I can't stand even ever so > > slight hue "deviations" along the d-curve, e.g. one part being warm, > > one part cooler, and one part more neutral ... > > Of course, the problem with a "monotone" inkset is that different papers > print with different tones or colorcasts in different parts of the curve. > One reason for the variable-tone approach is to be able to profile the > papers so that they are even. Identical ink colors doesn't do it. > > For example, Eboni is closer to neutral in the dark shadows than in the > lighter tones. > > > > Of course I should like to get slightly more neutral prints than you > > can get with the BO-Ebony-k technique but then I am a purist as far as > > the overall hue goes. No compromise there (see above). > > UT-FS is probably your best shot. > > Good luck. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com Dear Paul thanks for your knowledgeable answer(s) 1) I recently was given an EPSON 1520 for free, practically no copies "on the clock", but unused for more than two years and of course clogged, clogged, clogged... I used almost all the tricks of the trade I have heard of and when after two to three weeks of fiddling around I was on the verge of giving up it began to print again. Today I am proud to say its working properly again. It would have been such a shame to throw that printer away .... So perhaps I should follow the same procedure with my EPSON 1160. We'll wait and see. 2) Taking it from your very precise description of MIS FS vs MIS FSN behaviour I will opt for the FS "shot" on EAM/EEM and Hahnemühle PR. I do realize but now that matters are much more complex than I thought: (Printer), Inks AND paper playing an nonlinear trio in the tone/colorcast issue of the curve and that proper profiling would be the answer ... (but then I have an EPSON 2100, too). Chatzebussi P.S. OT: Remember "Where is Haunmeyer" a few years ago?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MIS FS vs MIS FSN in an EPSON1160
2005-05-31 by chatzebussi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.