Austin, I don't normally sharpen either, I just scan at the highest resolution I can get, then wait while the file opens in PS [g]. Sharpening can, however, be an expressive tool- e.g.. Martin's image in the photo exchange, where the background is left soft and somewhat grainy, while the stone chimney is sharp, sharp, sharp. Somehow the combination puts you (or at least me) into the scene. Otherwise sharpening is just trying to get lo-res to look like an 8x10 contact print- why bother! Bill on 12/5/01 9:46 AM, Austin Franklin wrote: Hi Bill, You may very well be right, since sharpening certainly can change tonal values! I do NOT sharpen, nor do I advocate it...but I do understand some people believe they need it...and I am sure they really do (well, I guess I'm sure they do for what they have, but I believe there is some problem in their process that necessitates this...), but I'm not clear if it's their scanner, camera, lense, film, developing or what...that necessitates the need for sharpening. Regards, Austin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Bill Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.