----- Original Message ----- From: "culturalvisions" <frank@...> > I have two major complaints about scans of my b&w and color > negs. > > 1. They look grainier than silver or color chemical prints of the > same. GEM helps improve this at the cost of very long scan > times. I've read that this grainy appearance is called "grain > aliasing" and is aparent in most prosumer scanners. Frank, there has been a complaint about the grain problem - think it was on the film scanners list - from a guy who is using the Polaroid 120 - same problem apparently. I see 2 ways to get around this: - buy a more expensive scanner, maybe the Imacon photo (too much for me) - take care to shoot only very fine grain film (slower than 100) and be careful to use chemicals that don\ufffdt emphathize the grain. I had made a scan of a photo I thought was good by a service, but was dissappointed by the amount of very visible grain in the scan. Don\ufffdt know what scanner they use, but the problem seems to be there. But as I shoot mainly b&w, this problem leaves me worried, although others don\ufffdt consider it as bad. Greetings Bernhard
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: review of the Minolti multi pro
2001-12-04 by Bernie Ess
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.