Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: review of the Minolti multi pro

2001-12-04 by Bernie Ess

----- Original Message -----
From: "culturalvisions" <frank@...>

> I have two major complaints about scans of my b&w and color
> negs.
>
> 1.  They look grainier than silver or color chemical prints of the
> same.  GEM helps improve this at the cost of very long scan
> times.  I've read that this grainy appearance is called "grain
> aliasing" and is aparent in most prosumer scanners.

Frank,
there has been a complaint about the grain problem - think it was on the
film scanners list - from a guy who is using the Polaroid 120 - same problem
apparently. I see 2 ways to get around this:
- buy a more expensive scanner, maybe the Imacon photo (too much for me)
- take care to shoot only very fine grain film (slower than 100) and be
careful to use chemicals that don\ufffdt emphathize the grain.

I had made a scan of a photo I   thought was good by a service, but was
dissappointed by the amount of very visible grain in the scan. Don\ufffdt know
what scanner they use, but the problem seems to be there.

But as I shoot mainly b&w, this problem leaves me worried, although others
don\ufffdt consider it as bad.

Greetings Bernhard

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.