The reason I've always stayed away from glossy inkjet prints for my own work is the fact that they are rc based. I have a closet full of old rc type c and black and white prints from 20+ years ago and they have already become brittle and dried out. The plastic just seems to have aged badly under average storage conditions while fiber prints in the same boxes look like new. And I'm not talking about prints that have been subjected to even norml WR type uv components. I know that Cibas tend to hold up better and I don't know why. Personally I think Wilhelms data about rc prints is overly optimistic. I used to use a paper that Epson made called Glossy Paper Photo Weight. It was a non-rc glossy paper and it looked very rich and saturated even in the reds with CF pigments. It was never condisdered "archival" and I"m not sure what the reason for that was. The reason I stopped using it altogether was that it scratched so easily in the printer and out of it. I even went to an Epson event where they had a bunch of prints hanging up and their Glossy P Photo Weight prints were scratched too. Too bad because I like what they were onto there - fiber glossy prints that didn't look and feel like plastic. It would be nice to have something like the old Agfacolor fiber silver paper. John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Margaret Stratton < ms@m...> wrote: > Paul, > > What spray are you using on you prints. With MIS ink I assume. > > Thanks > M Stratton > > > On May 25, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Paul Roark wrote: > > > Dave, > > > > I think the best example that shows that the surface reflective > > characteristics are the main differences between matte and glossy > > papers > > with respect to dmax is that an Arches Hot Press, un-coated print > > jumps from > > about 1.5 to 2.5 with multiple coats of, for example, acrylic, > > applied to > > its surface to give it a gloss. > > > > The spectrophotometers we use for measuring dmax use nearly perfect > > lighting > > that avoids the problems of reflections. This gives the glossy > > papers a > > huge advantage. > > > > In the real world, a matte print sitting on my desk top appears to > > have a > > better dmax than a gloss print because the glossy print dmax is wiped > > out by > > reflections. That is, the nature of the lighting is what makes all > > the > > difference. If the display conditions are perfect, the glossy prints > > are > > terrific. If the lighting is bad, like a window behind the viewer, > > matte > > wins. > > > > Of course, if one puts glass over matte, you may end up with the > > worst of > > both worlds. So, my favorite is a sprayed Semimatte with no glass. > > But, I > > think both types of prints are important, and being able to print > > either > > matte or glossy is a critical part of any inkset I mix. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > > > davelongviews > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:29 AM > > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [Digital BW] Matte versus glossy dmax: a matter of physics? > > > > > > There has been a lot of discussion over extended periods on the > > group > > > regarding matte > > > and glossy dmax. Is it true that light SCATTERED at the paper > > surface is > > > what gives a matte > > > surface its look, and that very same scattering is what reduces > > dmax? And > > > with a glossy > > > paper less light is scattered, more is REFLECTED, dmax is greater, > > and you > > > have the > > > glossyness to deal with. In other words isn't it true that you > > can't have > > > a matte surface with > > > a truely large dmax? Aren't paper surface/glossiness and dmax > > directly > > > related in a way we > > > wish they weren't? Is it physically possible to separate the two? > > Any > > > thoughts? > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > > resources as > > > they are often being updated. > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > > wish to > > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > > this same > > > page. > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > > to keep > > > them short. > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > flames. > > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > > > membership without notice. > > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > > B&W > > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > > removed from > > > the membership. > > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > > Owner > > > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > > > section: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > > PRINT > > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > > LIABLE TO > > > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > > > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > > > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > > > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE > > BEEN > > > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) > > THE USE > > > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > > > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; > > (iii) > > > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE > > PRINT > > > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, > > THE > > > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > > resources as they are often being updated. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > > this same page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > > keep them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from > > the membership without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > > removed from the membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > > Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the > > Files section: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" > > AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > > LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), > > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF > > YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD > > PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > Service. > > > > > Margaret Stratton > Obermann Center Research Scholar > Professor of Art > Department of Art and Art History > Iowa City, IA 52245 > www.margaretstratton.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matte versus glossy dmax: a matter of physics?
2005-05-31 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.