Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: The Epson R1800 is the replacement for the 2100/2200

2005-06-01 by john dean

They probably haven't decided yet.



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Scott West" <
westsdad@c...> wrote:
> Here's the reply that I got back from Epson when I asked about the 
statement
> on Amazon's web site about the R1800 being discontinued.  I would have 
used
> "Fortunately" instead of "Unfortunately"!
> 
> 
> "Thank you for contacting the Epson Connection.
> 
> Unfortunately the statement on the Amazon.com website is incorrect.  The
> R1800 is not being discontinued.
> 
> If you require further assistance with this particular issue, please ensure
> all of our previous correspondence is contained in your reply, so we can
> better track the history of this issue.
> 
> If you have a different technical support issue, please submit another
> E-form via our website (http://www.epson.com), and we will respond in a
> timely manner.  Thank you again for contacting Epson.
> 
> 
> 
> Judy F
> Epson Connection"
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Robert W.
> Shearer
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:45 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: The Epson R1800 is the replacement for the
> 2100/2200
> 
> I reviewed the Epson site. There is no mention of this new printer being 
> discontinued. It appears to be in stock in many places. I have been 
> considering adding this printer to my workflow. I have been very impressed 
> by the build quality. I would not want to purchase and have a major price 
> drop in two weeks. Are you sure that Amazon is not making one of the many 
> mistakes that they are so famous for over the years?
> Bob

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.